A highly political example of lying with charts

image

At hearings yesterday about Planned Parenthood, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) put up the chart above.  This tweet gives the apparent source of the graph, which is an anti-abortion organization.  Abortion is of course a highly charged issue, and feelings run high, but there is no excuse for making a chart that misleads so blatantly.  Whoever made the graph just superimposed two different graphs with different Y axes, making it quantitatively meaningless and highly misleading.

As Timothy B. Lee at Vox pointed out, the correct way to make such a graph is here:

image

The 2nd graph tells a very different (and accurate) story.  Shame on whoever made the first graph, and shame on Representative Chaffetz for using it.  That’s lying with graphs in a truly blatant manner.

Here’s the old classic book on this topic: How to Lie with Statistics

Also see two more recent resources, my own book Turning Numbers into Knowledge and Stephen Few’s book Show Me the Numbers.

Update:  Blogger Brainwrap at Daily Kos posted a different version of the graph that gives additional context, adding up all the various procedures performed by Planned Parenthood.


Blog Archive
Stock1

Koomey researches, writes, and lectures about climate solutions, critical thinking skills, and the environmental effects of information technology.

Partial Client List

  • AMD
  • Dupont
  • eBay
  • Global Business Network
  • Hewlett Packard
  • IBM
  • Intel
  • Microsoft
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Rocky Mountain Institute
  • Samsung
  • Sony
  • Sun Microsystems
  • The Uptime Institute
Copyright © 2025 Jonathan Koomey